Items where department is "Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method"

University Structure (106206) LSE (106206) Academic Departments (62869) Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method (1649)
Number of items: 66.
None
  • Alexander, Jason, Bicchieri, Cristina (Eds.) (2007). PSA: proceedings of the biennial meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. University of Chicago Press.
  • Alexander, J McKenzie (2007). The structural evolution of morality. Cambridge University Press.
  • Baggini, Julian, Voorhoeve, Alex, Audard, Catherine, Meckled-Garcia, Saladin, McWalter, Tony (2007). Security and the 'war on terror': a roundtable. In Baggini, Julian, Strangroom, Jeremy (Eds.), What More Philosophers Think (pp. 19-32). Continuum (Firm).
  • Beisbart, Claus, Bovens, Luc (2007). Welfarist evaluations of decision rules for boards of representatives. Social Choice and Welfare, 29(4), 581-608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-007-0246-z
  • Bovens, Luc, Beisbart, C (2007). Factions in Rousseau's Du Contrat Social and Federal Representation. Analysis, 67(293), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8284.2007.00643.x
  • Bovens, Luc, Hartmann, Stephan (2007). Special issue on Bayesian epistemology edited by L. Bovens and S. Hartmann. Synthese, 156(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9130-0
  • Bradley, Richard (2007). Consensus by aggregation and deliberation.
  • Bradley, Richard (2007). Impartiality in 'Weighing Lives'. Philosophical Books, 48(4), 292-302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0149.2007.00450_2.x
  • Bradley, Richard (2007). Reaching a consensus. Social Choice and Welfare, 29(4), 609-632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-007-0247-y
  • Bradley, Richard (2007). A defence of the Ramsey Test. Mind, 116(461), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzm001
  • Bradley, Richard (2007). The kinematics of belief and desire. Synthese, 156(3), 513-535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9136-7
  • Bradley, Richard (2007). A unified Bayesian decision theory. Theory and Decision, 63(3), 233-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-007-9029-3
  • Cartwright, Nancy (2007). Are RCTs the gold standard? Biosocieties, 2(1), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1745855207005029
  • Cartwright, Nancy (2007). Are RCTs the gold standard? In Cartwright, Nancy (Ed.), Causal Powers: What Are They? Why Do We Need Them What Can Be Done With Them and What Cannot? . Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, London School of Economic and Political Science.
  • Cartwright, Nancy (2007). Causal laws, policy predictions and the need for genuine powers. In Cartwright, Nancy (Ed.), Causal Powers: What Are They? Why Do We Need Them? What Can Be Done With Them and What Cannot? (pp. 6-30). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science.
  • Cartwright, Nancy (2007). Causal powers: what are they? why do we need them? what can be done with them and what cannot? (Contingency and Dissent in Science 07). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science.
  • Cartwright, Nancy (2007). Counterfactuals in economics: a commentary. In Campbell, Joseph Keim, O'Rourke, Michael, Silverstein, Harry S (Eds.), Causation and Explanation . MIT Press.
  • Cartwright, Nancy (2007). Counterfactuals in economics: a commentary. In Hunting Causes and Using Them: Approaches in Philosophy and Economics . Cambridge University Press.
  • Cartwright, Nancy (2007). Evidence-based policy: where is our theory of evidence? (Contingency and Dissent in Science 07/07). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science.
  • Cartwright, Nancy (2007). From metaphysics to method: comments on manipulability and the causal Markov condition. In Hunting Causes and Using Them: Approaches in Philosophy and Economics (pp. 132-152). Cambridge University Press.
  • Cartwright, Nancy (2007). Hunting causes and using them: approaches in philosophy and economics. Cambridge University Press.
  • Cartwright, Nancy (2007). What makes a capacity a disposition? In Cartwright, Nancy (Ed.), Causal Powers: What Are They? Why Do We Need Them? What Can Be Done With Them and What Cannot? (pp. 46-57). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science.
  • Cartwright, Nancy (2007). What makes a capacity a disposition? In Kistler, Max, Gnassounou, Bruno (Eds.), Dispositions and Causal Powers (pp. 195 - 206). Ashgate Dartmouth. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315577616-12
  • Cartwright, Nancy (2007). Where is the theory in our 'theories' of causality? In Hunting Causes and Using Them: Approaches in Philosophy and Economics (pp. 43-56). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618758.005
  • Cartwright, Nancy (2007). Why be hanged for even a lamb? In Monton, Bradley (Ed.), IMAges of Empiricism Essays on Science and Stances, With a Reply From Bas C. Van Fraassen . Oxford University Press.
  • Cartwright, Nancy, Frigg, Roman (2007). String theory under scrutiny.
  • Dall Chiara, Maria Luisa, Giuntini, Roberto, Rédei, Miklós (2007). The history of quantum logic. In Gabbay, Dov M., Woods, John (Eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic: the Many Valued and Nonmotonic Turn in Logic (pp. 205-283). Elsevier (Firm). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1874-5857(07)80007-0
  • Debs, Talal A., Redhead, Michael (2007). Objectivity, invariance, and convention: symmetry in physical science. Harvard University Press.
  • Dietrich, Franz (2007). A generalised model of judgment aggregation. Social Choice and Welfare, 28(4), 529-565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-006-0187-y
  • Fleurbaey, Marc (2007). Living standards and capabilities: equal values or equal sets? Analyse and Kritik: Zeitschrift fur Sozialtheorie, 29(2), 226-234.
  • Fleurbaey, Marc (2007). Social choice and just institutions: new perspectives. Economics and Philosophy, 23(01), p. 15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267107001204
  • Fleurbaey, Marc (2007). Social choice and the indexing dilemma. Social Choice and Welfare, 29(4), 633-648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-007-0248-x
  • Fleurbaey, Marc, Gaulier, Guillaume (2007). International comparisons of living standards by equivalent incomes. (CEPII working papers 2007-03). Centre d'Etudes Prospectives et d'Informations Internationales (CEPII).
  • Fleurbaey, Marc, Maniquet, F. (2007). Fair social orderings. Economic Theory, 34(1), 25-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-006-0132-4
  • Frigg, Arno, Frigg, Roman, Hintermann, Beat, Barg, Alexey, Valderrabano, Victor (2007). The biomechanical influence of tibio-talar containment on stability of the ankle joint. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 15(11), 1355-1362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-007-0372-2
  • Frigg, Roman, Hartmann, Stephan (2007). Introduction - special issue. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 38(2), p. 231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2007.03.001
  • Frigg, Roman, Hoefer, Carl (2007). Probability in GRW Theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 38(2), 371-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2006.12.002
  • Howson, Colin (2007). Logic with numbers. Synthese, 156(3), 491-512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9135-8
  • Howson, Colin (2007). Reply to Hudson: "Howson on novel confirmation". Logic and Philosophy of Science, 5(1), 33-41.
  • Howson, Colin (2007). An interview with Colin Howson. The Reasoner, 1(6), 1-3.
  • Lever, Annabelle (2007). Is judicial review undemocratic? Public Law, (Summer), 280-298.
  • List, Christian (2007). Deliberation and agreement. In Rosenberg, Shawn W (Ed.), Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the People Govern? (pp. 64-81). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Makinson, David C. (2007). Friendliness and sympathy in logic. In Beziau, Jean-Yves (Ed.), Logica Universalis: Towards a General Theory of Logic (pp. 195-224). Birkhäuser (Firm).
  • Montuschi, Eleonora (2007). New paradigms of social objects: ontological complexity and methodological trans-disciplinarity. In Broutti, S (Ed.), Models for the Human Sciences. Anthropology, Complex Systems and Cognitive Science . Trouber.
  • Montuschi, Eleonora (2007). Real, invented or applied?: some reflections on scientific objectivity and social ontology. In Lawson, C, Latsis, J S, Martins, N M (Eds.), Contributions to Social Ontology (pp. 177-191). Routledge.
  • Rédei, Miklós (2007). The birth of quantum logic. History and Philosophy of Logic, 28(2), 107-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340601113955
  • Schulz, Armin (2007). Condorcet and communitarianism: Boghossian’s fallacious inference. Synthese, 166(1), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9257-7
  • Steele, Katie Siobhan (2007). Distinguishing indeterminate belief from "risk-averse" preferences. Synthese, 158(2), 189-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9119-8
  • Steele, Katie Siobhan, Regan, Helen M., Colyvan, Mark, Burgman, Mark A. (2007). Right decisions or happy decision‐makers? Social Epistemology, 21(4), 349-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691720601159711
  • Torfeh, Massoumeh (2007). Clouds over Kabul. The Guardian,
  • Public
  • Dietrich, Franz, List, Christian (2007). Judgment aggregation with consistency alone. Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Dietrich, Franz, List, Christian (2007). Majority voting on restricted domains. Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Dietrich, Franz, List, Christian (2007). The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation. Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Dietrich, Franz, List, Christian (2007). Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation. Social Choice and Welfare, 29(1), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-006-0196-x
  • Dietrich, Franz, List, Christian (2007). Judgment aggregation by quota rules: majority voting generalized. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 19(4), 391-424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629807080775
  • Dietrich, Franz, List, Christian (2007). Strategy-proof judgment aggregation. Economics and Philosophy, 23(3), 269-300. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267107001496
  • Hawthorne, James, Makinson, David C, (2007). The quantitative/qualitative watershed for rules of uncertain inference. Studia Logica, 86(2), 247-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-007-9061-x
  • Kourousias, George, Makinson, David C. (2007). Parallel interpolation, splitting, and relevance in belief change. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 72, 994-1002.
  • Lever, Annabelle (2007). Mill and the secret ballot: beyond coercion and corruption. Utilitas, 19(3), 354-378. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820807002634
  • List, Christian (2007). Group deliberation and the transformation of judgments: an impossibility result. (PSPE working papers 04-2007). Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • List, Christian (2007). Group deliberation and the transformation of judgments: an impossibility result. (PEPP 26). Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines.
  • List, Christian, Stoljar, Daniel (2007). What a dualist should say about the exclusion argument. Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Makinson, David C. (2007). Completeness theorems, representation theorems: what’s the difference? In Rønnow-Rasmussen, Toni, Petersson, Bjorn, Josefsson, Josef, Egonsson, Dan (Eds.), Hommage a Wlodek: Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Wlodek Rabinowicz . Lunds Universitet.
  • Rédei, Miklós, Summers, Stephen Jeffrey (2007). Quantum probability theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 38(2), 390-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2006.05.006
  • Saaristo, Antti Jussi (2007). Social ontology and agency. Methodological holism naturalised. [Doctoral thesis]. London School of Economics and Political Science. picture_as_pdf
  • Voorhoeve, Alex (2007). Heuristics and biases in a purported counterexample to the acyclicity of "better than". (LSE Choice Group working paper series vol. 3, no. 2). The Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science (CPNSS).