LSE creators

Number of items: 43.
2026
  • Dietrich, Franz, Spiekermann, Kai (2026). What are social norms? Economics and Philosophy, picture_as_pdf
    • 2025
  • Spiekermann, Kai (2025). Benson, Jonathan. Intelligent democracy answering the new democratic scepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024. Pp. 272. $90.00 (cloth). Ethics, 135(4), 768 - 773. https://doi.org/10.1086/735380
  • Dietrich, Franz, Spiekermann, Kai (2025). Deliberation and the wisdom of crowds. Economic Theory, 79(2), 603 - 655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-024-01595-4 picture_as_pdf
    • 2024
  • Niesen, Peter, Spiekermann, Kai, Herzog, Lisa, Girard, Charles, Vogelmann, Frieder (2024). Does diversity trump ability? Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 65(4), 785 - 805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-024-00550-1 picture_as_pdf
    • 2022
  • Spiekermann, Kai (2022). Good reasons for losers: lottery justification and social risk. Economics and Philosophy, 38(1), 108 - 131. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267121000043 picture_as_pdf
  • Spiekermann, Kai (2022). Irreversible loss. In Gardiner, Stephen (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Intergenerational Ethics . Oxford University Press. picture_as_pdf
    • 2021
  • Spiekermann, Kai, Dietrich, Franz (2021). Jury theorems. In Zalta, Edward N. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy . Stanford University Press.
    • 2020
  • Spiekermann, Kai (2020). Why populists do well on social media. Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric, 12(2), 50 - 71. https://doi.org/10.21248/gjn.12.02.203 picture_as_pdf
  • Slavny, Adam, Spiekermann, Kai, Lawford-Smith, Holly, Axelsen, David V. (2020). Directed reflective equilibrium: thought experiments and how to use them. Journal of Moral Philosophy, https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243_20203008 picture_as_pdf
  • Spiekermann, Kai, Slavny, Adam, Axelsen, David V., Lawford-Smith, Holly (2020). Big data justice: a case for regulating the global information commons. Journal of Politics, 0(0), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1086/709862 picture_as_pdf
  • Spiekermann, Kai (2020). Epistemic network injustice. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 19(1), 83-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X19872505 picture_as_pdf
  • Spiekermann, Kai (2020). Group duties: their existence and their implications for individuals. Mind, https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzaa004 picture_as_pdf
  • Dietrich, Franz, Spiekermann, Kai (2020). Social epistemology. In Knauff, M., Spohn, W. (Eds.), The Handbook of Rationality . MIT Press. picture_as_pdf
    • 2019
  • Dietrich, Franz, Spiekermann, Kai (2019). Jury theorems. In Fricker, Miranda, Graham, Peter J., Henderson, David, Pedersen, Nikolaj, Wyatt, Jeremy (Eds.), The Routledge companion to social epistemology (pp. 386-396). Routledge. picture_as_pdf
    • 2018
  • Goodin, Robert E., Spiekermann, Kai (2018). Epilogue what about Trump and Brexit? In Goodin, Robert E., Spiekermann, Kai (Eds.), An Epistemic Theory of Democracy (pp. p. 322). Oxford University Press. picture_as_pdf
  • Goodin, Robert E., Spiekermann, Kai (2018). An epistemic theory of democracy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198823452.001.0001
    • 2017
  • Spiekermann, Kai (2017). Book review: reduction of surprise: some thoughts on Dowding's conception of explanation. Political Studies Review, 15(2), 187-193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929917693641
    • 2016
  • List, Christian, Spiekermann, Kai (2016). The Condorcet jury theorem and voter-specific truth. In McLaughlin, Brian P., Kornblith, Hilary (Eds.), Goldman and His Critics (pp. 219-234). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118609378.ch10
  • Spiekermann, Kai (2016). Four types of moral wriggle room: uncovering mechanisms of racial discrimination. In Fricker, Miranda, Brady, Michael S. (Eds.), The Epistemic Life of Groups: Essays in the Epistemology of Collectives . Oxford University Press.
  • Spiekermann, Kai, Weiss, Arne (2016). Objective and subjective compliance: a norm-based explanation of 'moral wiggle room'. Games and Economic Behavior, 96, 170-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2015.11.007
    • 2015
  • Goodin, Robert E., Spiekermann, Kai (2015). Epistemic solidarity as a political strategy. Episteme, 12(4), 439-457. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2015.29
    • 2014
  • Spiekermann, Kai (2014). Small impacts and imperceptible effects: causing harm with others. Midwest Studies In Philosophy, 38(1), 75-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/misp.12017
  • Spiekermann, Kai (2014). Buying low, flying high: carbon offsets and partial compliance. Political Studies, 62(4), 913-929. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12044
  • Goodin, Robert E., Spiekermann, Kai (2014). Epistemic solidarity as a political strategy. (Working paper). Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science.
    • 2013
  • List, Christian, Spiekermann, Kai (2013). Methodological individualism and holism in political science: a reconciliation. American Political Science Review, 107(4), 629-643. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000373
  • Spiekermann, Kai, Weiss, Arne (2013). Objective and subjective compliance: how 'moral wiggle room' opens. (Working paper). Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Dietrich, Franz, Spiekermann, Kai (2013). Independent opinions? On the causal foundations of belief formation and jury theorems. Mind, 122(487), 655-685. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzt074
  • Spiekermann, Kai (2013). Book review: Framing democracy: a behavioral approach to democratic theory, Jamie Terence Kelly. Ethics, 123(3), 568-572. https://doi.org/10.1086/670201
  • Dietrich, Franz, Spiekermann, Kai (2013). Epistemic democracy with defensible premises. Economics and Philosophy, 29(1), 87-120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267113000096
  • Spiekermann, Kai (2013). Judgement aggregation and distributed thinking. In Cowley, Stephen J., Vallée-Tourangeau, Frédéric (Eds.), Cognition Beyond the Brain: Computation, Interactivity and Human Artifice (pp. 31-51). Springer London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5125-8_3
    • 2012
  • Goodin, Robert E., Spiekermann, Kai (2012). Epistemic aspects of representative government. European Political Science Review, 4(3), 303-325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773911000245
  • Spiekermann, Kai, Goodin, Robert E. (2012). Courts of many minds. British Journal of Political Science, 42(3), 555-571. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341100041X
    • 2011
  • Spiekermann, Kai (2011). Book review: Beyond humanity, by Allen Buchanan. Revista de Direito Sanitário, 12(1), 293-302.
  • Peter, Fabienne, Spiekermann, Kai (2011). Rules, norms, and commitment. In Jarvie, Ian C., Zamora-Bonilla, Jesus (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Philosophy of Social Science . Sage Publications Ltd..
    • 2010
  • Dietrich, Franz, Spiekermann, Kai (2010). Epistemic democracy with defensible premises. (Working papers). London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Dietrich, Franz, Spiekermann, Kai (2010). Independent opinions? (Working papers). London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Spiekermann, Kai (2010). Judgement aggregation and distributed thinking. AI and Society, 25(4), 401-412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-010-0273-7
  • Goodin, Robert E., Spiekermann, Kai (2010). Epistemic aspects of representative government. London School of Economics and Political Science.
    • 2009
  • Spiekermann, Kai (2009). Sort out your neighbourhood: public good games on dynamic networks. Synthese, 168(2), 273-294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9424-5
  • Spiekermann, Kai (2009). What the neighbours think: state-building, esteem and political culture. In Raue, Julia, Sutter, Patrick (Eds.), Facets and Practices of State-Building . Brill Academic Publishers.
    • 2008
  • Spiekermann, Kai (2008). Norms and games: realistic moral theory and the dynamic analysis of cooperation [Doctoral thesis]. London School of Economics and Political Science. picture_as_pdf
  • Spiekermann, Kai (2008). Reply: clubbish justice. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 7(4), 447-453. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X08095755
    • 2007
  • Spiekermann, Kai (2007). Translucency, assortation, and information pooling: how groups solve social dilemmas. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 6(3), 285-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X07081300