Items where Subject is "J General legislative and executive papers"

Library of Congress subjects (102130) J Political Science (34718) J General legislative and executive papers (61)
Number of items at this level: 61.
None
  • Bail, Christoph, Falkner, Robert, Marquard, Helen (Eds.) (2002). The Cartagena protocol on biosafety: reconciling trade in biotechnology with environment and development? Earthscan Publications Ltd..
  • Kaldor, Mary, Vejvoda, Ivan (Eds.) (2002). Democratization in Central and Eastern Europe. Continuum (Firm).
  • Banerjee, Mukulika (2014). Why India votes? Routledge India.
  • Barker, Rodney (2003). Pluralism, revenant or recessive? In Hayward, J., Barry, B., Brown, A. (Eds.), The British Study of Politics in the Twentieth Century . Oxford University Press.
  • Bear, Laura (2006). An economy of suffering: Addressing the violence of discipline in railway workers' petitions to the agent of the East Indian Railway, 1930-47. In Rao, Anupama, Peirce, Steven (Eds.), Discipline and the Other Body: Correction, Corporeality, Colonialism (pp. 243-272). Duke University Press.
  • Chwieroth, Jeffrey (2002). Counterfactuals and the study of the American presidency. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 32(2), 293-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0360-4918.2002.00222.x
  • Coleman, Janet (2005). Proprieta: premoderna e moderna. In Chignola, Sandro, Duso, Giuseppe (Eds.), Sui Concetti Giuridici e Politici Della Costituzione Dell'europa (pp. p. 119). Franco Angeli editore.
  • Corazza, Ornella, Roman-Urrestarazu, Andres (2015). Psychoactive substances bill: written evidence submitted by Dr Ornella Corazza and Dr Andres Roman Urrestarazu. (Public Bill Committee Debates). UK Parliament.
  • Felli, Leonardo, Merlo, Antonio (2007). If you cannot get your friends elected, lobby your enemies. Journal of the European Economic Association, 5(2-3), 624-635.
  • Gardner, Katy, Lewis, David (2000). Dominant paradigms overturned or 'business as usual'? Development discourse and the White Paper on international development. Critique of Anthropology, 20(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X0002000106
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1952). Courts-Martial (Appeals) Act, 1951. Modern Law Review, 15(1), 65-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1952.tb02111.x
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1955). The Crichel Down affair. Modern Law Review, 18(6), 557-570. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1955.tb00322.x
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1949). Delegated legislation - some recent developments. Modern Law Review, 12(3), 297-318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1949.tb00127.x
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1974). Parliamentary scrutiny of Government bills. George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1960). Reports of committees: first report of the Council of Tribunals. Modern Law Review, 23(6), 660-662. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1960.tb00633.x
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1957). Reports of committees: special report from the Select Committee of the House of Commons Disqualification Bill (H.C. 349 of 1955-1956). Modern Law Review, 18(6), 52-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1957.tb00425.x
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1959). Statutes: The Local Government Act, 1958. Modern Law Review, 22(3), 297-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1959.tb00528.x
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1959). Tribunals and inquiries. Modern Law Review, 22(2), 125-145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1959.tb02165.x
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1972). The legislative process in the House of Commons. Institute of Constitutional and Parliamentary Studies (New Delhi, India).
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1951). The place of parliament in the legislative process: part I. Modern Law Review, 14(3), 279-296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1951.tb00207.x
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1951). The place of parliament in the legislative process: part II. Modern Law Review, 14(4), 425-436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1951.tb00217.x
  • Griffith, J. A. G. (1979). The political constitution. Modern Law Review, 42(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1979.tb01506.x
  • Halliday, Fred (2002). A new global configuration. In Leonard, Mark (Ed.), Re-Ordering the World: the Long-Term Implications of 11 September (pp. 104-111). Foreign Policy Centre (London, England).
  • Henry, Marsha (2012). Peacexploitation?: interrogating labor hierarchies and global sisterhood among Indian and Uruguayan female peacekeepers. Globalizations, 9(1), 15-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2012.627716
  • Kleine, Mareike (2012). Knowing your limits: informal governance and judgment in the EU. Review of International Organizations, 8(2), 245-264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-012-9148-7
  • Mossialos, Elias, McKee, Martin (2002). The influence of EU law on the social character of health care systems. Verlag Peter Lang.
  • Mullis, Alastair, Scott, Andrew (2011). Worth the candle?: the government's draft Defamation Bill. Journal of Media Law, 3(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.5235/175776311796471242
  • Munro, Eileen (2012). Review: Children and young people's missed health care appointments: reconceptualising 'Did Not Attend' to 'Was Not Brought' - a review of the evidence for practice. Journal of Research in Nursing, 17(2), 193-194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987112438159
  • Murray, Andrew D. (2005). Contracting electronically in the shadow of the e-commerce directive. In Edwards, Lilian (Ed.), The New Legal Framework for E-Commerce in Europe (pp. 67-92). Hart Publishing.
  • Navarra, Diego D., Cornford, Tony (2009). Globalization, networks, and governance: Researching global ICT programs. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 35-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.08.003
  • Prabhakar, Rajiv (2006). Rethinking public services. Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Public
  • Alexander, Kate (2016). “Brexit chaos proves that I was right all along,” says everyone. Our political narratives need to change, or they’ll become barriers to thought.
  • Allen, Graham (2017). In defence of representative democracy: How I will be voting on the Article 50 bill, by Graham Allen MP.
  • Barnett, Steven (2017). Press regulation: three reasons why a 30 year old campaign must continue.
  • Blutinger, Erik J. (2014). The passage of Obamacare is a lesson in how to outmaneuver institutions and pass controversial policy legislation.
  • Bouton, Laurent, Conconi, Paola, Pino, Francisco J, Zanardi, Maurizio (2013). The U.S. Senate’s failure to pass gun control legislation is the victory of an intense minority against an apathetic majority.
  • Bouçek, Francoise (2017). Put Le Pen and Macron to one side – it’s the June legislative elections that will decide how France is governed.
  • Bratsis, Peter (2003). The constitution of the Greek-Americans. (Discussion paper 9). Hellenic Observatory, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Costas, Milas (2016). Brexit is already affecting the economy – despite the short-term fluctuations of the stock market.
  • Dür, Andreas, Bernhagen, Patrick, Marshall, David (2015). Contrary to popular opinion, business actors are less successful than citizen groups at lobbying EU legislators.
  • Gilson, Christopher (2014). Hillary Clinton’s wealth gaffes, Speaker Boehner plans to sue Obama, and should the U.S. be more like France? – U.S. national blog round up for 21 – 27 June.
  • Haacke, Jürgen (2011). The nature and management of Myanmar’s alignment with China: the SLORC/SPDC years. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 30(2), 105-140.
  • Hartlapp, Miriam, Metz, Julia, Rauh, Christian (2015). Conflict inside the European Commission is a key factor in shaping EU legislation.
  • José Javier, Olivas, Scrollini, Fabrizio (2013). The bumpy road to transparency in Spain.
  • Keranen, Outi (2013). Managing the crisis through secrecy?
  • Kirkland, Justin H. (2014). Citizens’ ideology drives ideological polarization and partisanship in U.S state legislatures.
  • Loewen, Peter, Koop, Royce (2014). The ability to propose legislation leads to an increased vote share for politicians in subsequent elections.
  • Marsh, Alex (2013). The proposal for a global parliament of mayors reflects their distinctive, locally-rooted form of legitimacy.
  • Oliver, Tim, Möller, Almut (2015). Written evidence to the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee’s inquiry into 'the costs and benefits of EU membership for the UK's role in the world'. House of Commons.
  • O’Brien, Erin, Bentele, Keith Gunnar (2014). Evidence suggests that state legislators are working to restrict access to the vote in response to minority turnout.
  • Phull, Kiran, Ciflikli, Gokhan, Meibauer, Gustav (2018). Gender and bias in the international relations curriculum: insights from reading lists. European Journal of International Relations, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066118791690
  • Pinto, Mattia (2018). Awakening the leviathan through human rights law – how human rights bodies trigger the application of criminal law. Utrecht Journal of International and European Law, 34(2), 161-184. https://doi.org/10.5334/ujiel.462 picture_as_pdf
  • Power, Sam (25 January 2017) The funding of politics in Great Britain – an issue transformed. British Politics and Policy at LSE. picture_as_pdf
  • Rogers, Chris, Clarke, Chris (2017). ‘Socially useful’ finance and the regulation of peer-to-peer lending in the United Kingdom.
  • Shaw, Eric (2016). Fractured and unmanageable? Labour Party Management under Blair and under Corbyn.
  • Smith, James A. (2016). Jeremy Corbyn’s ‘new politics’: entryism or ‘folk politics’ coming of age?
  • Surminski, Swenja (2016). When disaster strikes, who pays for the impacts of climate change?
  • Tiffin, Richard, Salois, Matthew (2011). A fat tax is a double whammy for the poor – it will do little to prevent obesity in those on lower incomes, and will hurt them financially.
  • Topinka, Robert (23 January 2017) What can Coronation Street tell us about politics? British Politics and Policy at LSE. picture_as_pdf
  • Whitley, Edgar A. (24 November 2016) Can data-sharing improve public services? Lessons for Parliament. British Politics and Policy at LSE. picture_as_pdf
  • Williamson, Andy (2011). The gender imbalance online seems to be the result of wider political exclusion, not digital exclusion.