JEL classification

Journal of Economic Literature Classification (10696) Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics (820) Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation (81) Q28 - Government Policy (16)
Number of items at this level: 16.
Centre for Analysis of Risk & Regulation
  • Matus, Kira J. M., Clark, William C., Anastas, Paul T., Zimmerman, Julie B. (2012). Barriers to the implementation of green chemistry in the United States. Environmental Science and Technology, 46(20), 10892-10899. https://doi.org/10.1021/es3021777
    • Centre for Economic Performance
  • Sturm, Daniel, List, John (2002-08-22 - 2002-08-24) Politics and environmental policy: theory and evidence from US states [Paper]. EEA 2002, Venice, Italy, ITA.
    • Economics
  • Jensen, Anders Ditlev (2011). State-building in resource-rich economies. Atlantic Economic Journal, 39(2), 171-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-011-9269-z
  • Karakosta, Ourania, Petropoulou, Dimitra (2022). The EU electricity market: renewables targets, Tradable Green Certificates and electricity trade. Energy Economics, 111, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106034 picture_as_pdf
  • Sturm, Daniel, List, John (2002-08-22 - 2002-08-24) Politics and environmental policy: theory and evidence from US states [Paper]. EEA 2002, Venice, Italy, ITA.
    • Geography and Environment
  • Andersen, Lykke E., Groom, Ben, Killick, Evan, Ledezma, Juan Carlos, Palmer, Charles, Weinhold, Diana (2017). Modelling land use, deforestation, and policy: a hybrid optimisation-heterogeneous agent model with application to the Bolivian Amazon. Ecological Economics, 135, 76-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.033
  • Engel, Stefanie, Palmer, Charles, Pfaff, Alexander (2013). On the endogeneity of resource comanagement: theory and evidence from Indonesia. Land Economics, 89(2), 308-329.
  • Engel, Stefanie, Palmer, Charles, Taschini, Luca, Urech, Simon (2012). Cost-effective payments for reducing emissions from deforestation under uncertainty. (Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment working paper No. 72). Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
  • Pearce, David, Palmer, Charles (2001). Public and private spending for environmental protection: a cross-country policy analysis. Fiscal Studies, 22(4), 403-456.
  • Shreedhar, Ganga, Mourato, Susana (2020). Linking human destruction of nature to COVID-19 increases support for wildlife conservation policies. Environmental and Resource Economics, 76(4), 963 - 999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00444-x picture_as_pdf
  • Swanson, Tim, Groom, Ben (2012). Regulating global biodiversity: what is the problem? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 28(1), 114-138. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grs003
    • Government
  • Matus, Kira J. M., Clark, William C., Anastas, Paul T., Zimmerman, Julie B. (2012). Barriers to the implementation of green chemistry in the United States. Environmental Science and Technology, 46(20), 10892-10899. https://doi.org/10.1021/es3021777
    • Grantham Research Institute
  • Bowen, Alex (2011). Raising finance to support developing country action: some economic considerations. (Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy and Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment working papers 36). Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy and Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
  • Buiter, Willem H., Fankhauser, Samuel, Fries, Steven (2005). Transition, welfare and sustainable development. In Fries, Steven (Ed.), Transition Report 2002: Agriculture and Rural Transition (pp. 3-13). European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
  • Engel, Stefanie, Palmer, Charles, Taschini, Luca, Urech, Simon (2012). Cost-effective payments for reducing emissions from deforestation under uncertainty. (Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment working paper No. 72). Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
  • Parsons, John E., Taschini, Luca (2011). Stocks and shocks: a clarification in the debate over price vs. quantity controls for greenhouse gases. (Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy and Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment working papers 43). Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy and Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
  • Parsons, John E., Taschini, Luca (2013). The role of stocks and shocks concepts in the debate over price versus quantity. Environmental and Resource Economics, 55(5), p. 71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9614-y
  • Saussay, AurĂ©lien, Zugravu-Soilita, Natalia (2023). International production chains and the pollution offshoring hypothesis: an empirical investigation. Resources and Energy Economics, 73, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2023.101357 picture_as_pdf
    • Psychological and Behavioural Science
  • Shreedhar, Ganga, Mourato, Susana (2020). Linking human destruction of nature to COVID-19 increases support for wildlife conservation policies. Environmental and Resource Economics, 76(4), 963 - 999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00444-x picture_as_pdf
    • Social Policy
  • Hall, Anthony (2012). Forests and climate change: the social dimensions of REDD in Latin America. Edward Elgar.