JEL classification

Journal of Economic Literature Classification (10696) C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods (1374) C9 - Design of Experiments (133) C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior (46)
Number of items at this level: 46.
2025
  • Gaertner, Wulf, Li, Yi (2025). Exempting agents from any burden sharing: a lab-experimental study on the distribution of a monetary loss. Journal of Economic Inequality, 23(3), 857 - 879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-025-09693-6 picture_as_pdf
  • Prati, Alberto, Saucet, Charlotte (2025). Is motivated memory (just) a matter of mood? Experimental Economics, https://doi.org/10.1017/eec.2025.10028 picture_as_pdf
    • 2024
  • Kovacs, Roxanne, Dunaiski, Maurice, Galizzi, Matteo M., Grimalda, Gianluca, Hortala-Vallve, Rafael, Murtin, Fabrice, Putterman, Louis (2024). The determinants of trust: findings from large, representative samples in six OECD countries. Economica, 91(364), 1521 - 1552. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12549 picture_as_pdf
  • Oliver, Adam (2024). Reflecting on reflection: prospect theory, our behaviors, and our environment. Behavioural Public Policy, 8(1), 173 - 183. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2021.31 picture_as_pdf
    • 2023
  • Bogliacino, Francesco, Charris, Rafael, Codagnone, Cristiano, Folkvord, Frans, Gaskell, George, Gómez, Camilo, Liva, Giovanni, Montealegre, Felipe (2023). Less is more: information overload in the labelling of fish and aquaculture products. Food Policy, 116, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102435 picture_as_pdf
  • Brañas-Garza, Pablo, Chowdhury, Subhasish M., Espín, Antonio M., Nieboer, Jeroen (2023). Born this way? Prenatal exposure to testosterone may determine behavior in competition and conflict. Journal of Economic Psychology, 96, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2023.102623 picture_as_pdf
    • 2022
  • Fiala, Lenka, Husovec, Martin (2022). Using experimental evidence to improve delegated enforcement. International Review of Law and Economics, 71, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2022.106079 picture_as_pdf
  • Koessler, Ann Kathrin (2022). Pledges and how social influence shapes their effectiveness. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 98, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2022.101848 picture_as_pdf
    • 2021
  • Bandiera, Oriana, Parekh, Nidhi, Petrongolo, Barbara, Rao, Michelle (2021). Men are from Mars, and women too: a Bayesian meta-analysis of overconfidence experiments. (CEP Discussion Papers 1820). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance. picture_as_pdf
  • Lagarde, Mylène, Blaauw, Duane (2021). Effects of incentive framing on performance and effort: evidence from a medically framed experiment. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 7(1), 33 - 48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-021-00100-0 picture_as_pdf
    • 2020
  • DeJarnette, Patrick, Dillenberger, David, Gottlieb, Daniel, Ortoleva, Pietro (2020). Time lotteries and stochastic impatience. Econometrica, 88(2), 619 - 656. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA16427 picture_as_pdf
  • Shreedhar, Ganga, Tavoni, Alessandro, Marchiori, Carmen (2020). Monitoring and punishment networks in an experimental common pool resource dilemma. Environment and Development Economics, 25(1), 66 - 94. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X19000457
    • 2018
  • Fiala, Lenka, Husovec, Martin (2018). Using experimental evidence to design optimal notice and takedown process. (TILEC Discussion Paper series 2018-028). SSRN.
  • Oliver, Adam (2018). Your money and your life: risk attitudes over gains and losses. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 57(1), 29 - 50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-018-9284-4 picture_as_pdf
  • Shreedhar, Ganga, Tavoni, Alessandro, Marchiori, Carmen (2018). Monitoring and punishment networks in a common-pool resource dilemma: experimental evidence. (Working Paper 327). Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, The Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy.
  • Toussaert, Séverine (2018). Eliciting temptation and self-control through menu choices: a lab experiment. Econometrica, 86(3), 859-889. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA14172
    • 2017
  • Toussaert, Séverine (2017). Intention-based reciprocity and signaling of intentions. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 137, 132-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.03.001
    • 2016
  • Mäs, Michael, Nax, Heinrich H. (2016). A behavioral study of “noise” in coordination games. Journal of Economic Theory, 162, 195-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2015.12.010
  • Spiekermann, Kai, Weiss, Arne (2016). Objective and subjective compliance: a norm-based explanation of 'moral wiggle room'. Games and Economic Behavior, 96, 170-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2015.11.007
  • Voorhoeve, Alex, Binmore, Ken G, Stefansson, Arnaldur, Stewart, Lisa (2016). Ambiguity attitudes, framing, and consistency. Theory and Decision, 81(3), 313-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-016-9544-1
    • 2015
  • Bougheas, Spiro, Nieboer, Jeroen, Sefton, Martin (2015). Risk taking and information aggregation in groups. Journal of Economic Psychology, 51, 34-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.08.001
  • Chen, Zhuoqiong (Charlie), Ong, David, Sheremeta, Roman M. (2015). The gender difference in the value of winning. Economics Letters, 137, 226-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2015.10.006
  • Dolan, Paul, Galizzi, Matteo M. (2015). Like ripples on a pond: behavioral spillovers and their implications for research and policy. Journal of Economic Psychology, 47, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2014.12.003
  • Galizzi, Matteo M., Nieboer, Jeroen (2015). Digit ratio (2D:4D) and altruism: evidence from a large, multi-ethnic sample. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, p. 41. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00041
  • Gold, Natalie, Pulford, Briony D., Colman, Andrew M. (2015). Do as I say, don't do as I do: differences in moral judgments do not translate into differences in decisions in real-life trolley problems. Journal of Economic Psychology, 47, 50 - 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.01.001 picture_as_pdf
    • 2014
  • Brañas-Garza, Pablo, Galizzi, Matteo M., Nieboer, Jeroen (2014). Digit ratio and risk taking: evidence from a large, multi-ethnic sample. (Working Papers 14-23). Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
  • Callen, Mike, Isaqzadeh, Mohammad, Long, James D., Sprenger, Charles (2014). Violence and risk preference: experimental evidence from Afghanistan. American Economic Review, 104(1), 123 - 148. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.1.123 picture_as_pdf
  • Cárdenas, Juan Camilo, Roux, Nicolas, Jaramillo, Christian R., Martinez, Luis Roberto (2014). Is it my money or not?: an experiment on risk aversion and the house-money effect. Experimental Economics, 17(1), 47-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-013-9356-x
  • Dolan, Paul, Galizzi, Matteo M. (2014). Because I'm worth it: a lab-field experiment on the spillover effects of incentives in health. (CEP Discussion Papers CEPDP1286). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance.
  • Taschini, Luca, Chesney, Marc, Wang, Mei (2014). Experimental comparison between markets on dynamic permit trading and investment in irreversible abatement with and without non-regulated companies. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 46(1), 23-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-013-9238-3
    • 2013
  • Fischer, Gregory (2013). Contract structure, risk sharing and investment choice. Econometrica, 81(3), 883-939. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA9100
  • Spiekermann, Kai, Weiss, Arne (2013). Objective and subjective compliance: how 'moral wiggle room' opens. (Working paper). Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science.
    • 2012
  • Azmat, Ghazala, Iriberri, Nagore (2012). The provision of relative performance feedback information: an experimental analysis of performance and happiness. (CEP Discussion Papers CEPDP1116). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance. picture_as_pdf
  • Coelho, Marta, de Meza, David (2012). Do bad risks know it? Experimental evidence on optimism and adverse selection. Economics Letters, 114(2), 168-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.10.012
  • Mujcic, Redzo, Frijters, Paul (2012). Economic choices and status: measuring preferences for income rank. Oxford Economic Papers, 65(1), 47-73. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpr065
  • Powdthavee, Nattavudh, Riyanto, Yohanes E. (2012). Why do people pay for useless advice? (CEP Discussion Papers CEPDP1153). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance. picture_as_pdf
    • 2011
  • Chesney, Marc, Taschini, Luca, Wang, Mei (2011). Regulated and non-regulated companies, technology adoption in experimental markets for emission permits, and options contracts. (Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy and Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment working papers 41). Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy and Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
  • Fischer, Gregory (2011). Contract structure, risk sharing and investment choice. (Economic Organisation and Public Policy Discussion Papers EOPP/2011/23). Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines.
    • 2010
  • Andersson, Ola, Galizzi, Matteo M., Hoppe, Tim, Kranz, Sebastian, der Wiel, Karen van, Wengström, Erik (2010). Persuasion in experimental ultimatum games. Economics Letters, 108(1), 16-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2010.03.011
  • Feri, Francesco, Irlenbusch, Bernd, Sutter, Matthias (2010). Efficiency gains from team-based coordination—large-scale experimental evidence. American Economic Review, 100(4), 1892-1912. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.4.1892
    • 2009
  • Kircher, Philipp, Ludwig, Sandra, Sandroni, Alvaro (2009). Fairness: a critique to the utilitarian approach. (SFB/TR 15 discussion paper). SFB TR 15 / GESY.
  • Tavoni, Alessandro (2009-01-23 - 2009-01-24) Incorporating fairness motives and quantal response equilibrium concepts: an application to 2x2 games [Other]. 14th Coalition Theory Network workshop, Maastricht, Netherlands, NLD.
    • 2003
  • Amiel, Yoram, Cowell, Frank, Davidovitz, Leima, Polovin, Avraham (2003). Preference reversals and the analysis of income distributions. (Distributional Analysis Research Programme; DARP 66 66). Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines.
    • 2002
  • Heinemann, Frank, Nagel, Rosemarie, Ockenfels, Peter (2002). Speculative attacks and financial architecture: experimental analysis of coordination games with public and private information. (Financial Markets Group Discussion Papers 416). Financial Markets Group, The London School of Economics and Political Science. picture_as_pdf
  • Huck, Steffan, Weizsacker, Georg (2002). Do players correctly estimate what others do?: Evidence of conservatism in beliefs. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 47(1), 71-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00170-6
    • 1999
  • Huck, Steffen, Weizsacker, Georg (1999). Risk, complexity, and deviations from expected-value maximization: results of a lottery choice experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20(6), 699-715. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(99)00031-8