JEL classification

Journal of Economic Literature Classification (10696) Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics (820) Q1 - Agriculture (136) Q12 - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets (14)
Number of items at this level: 14.
2025
  • Bulte, Erwin, Meriggi, Niccolò, Rozelle, Michael, Voors, Maarten (2025). Agricultural development in the poorest countries: insights from the poultry sector in Sierra Leone. In Pathways to African Food Security: Challenges, Threats and Opportunities towards 2050 (pp. 251-264). Taylor and Francis Inc.. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032649696-26 picture_as_pdf
    • 2024
  • Kolosov, Mikhail (2024). Farm servants in North Wiltshire: the evidence of hiring fairs, 1837–1860. Agriculture History Review, 72(2), 223-252. picture_as_pdf
    • 2023
  • Gáfaro, Margarita, Ibáñez, Ana María, Sánchez Ordóñez, Daniel, Ortiz, María Camila (2023). Farm size and income distribution of Latin American agriculture: new perspectives on an old issue. (III Working Papers 105). International Inequalities Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science. https://doi.org/10.21953/lse.f7a24e0gu9fx picture_as_pdf
    • 2022
  • Dinkelman, Taryn, Ngai, L. Rachel (2022). Time use and gender in Africa in times of structural transformation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 36(1), 57 - 80. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.36.1.57 picture_as_pdf
  • Macchiavello, Rocco, Reardon, Thomas, Richards, Timothy J. (2022). Empirical industrial organization economics to analyze developing country food value chains. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 14, 193 - 220. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-101721-023554 picture_as_pdf
    • 2021
  • Ding, Yihong, Balcombe, Kelvin, Robinson, Elizabeth (2021). Time discounting and implications for Chinese farmer responses to an upward trend in precipitation. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72(3), 916 - 930. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12434 picture_as_pdf
    • 2019
  • Casaburi, Lorenzo, Macchiavello, Rocco (2019). Demand and supply of infrequent payments as a commitment device: evidence from Kenya. American Economic Review, 109(2), 523-555. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20180281 picture_as_pdf
    • 2016
  • Claridge, Jordan (2016). The role of demesnes in the trade of agricultural horses in late medieval England. (Economic History Working Papers 251/2016). London School of Economics and Political Science, Economic History Department.
    • 2014
  • Lovo, Stefania (2014). Analyzing the welfare-improving potential of land in the former homelands of South Africa. Agricultural Economics, 45(6), 679-692. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12115
    • 2011
  • Vollenweider, Xavier, Di Falco, Salvatore, O’Donoghue, Cathal (2011). Risk preferences and voluntary agri-environmental schemes: does risk aversion explain the uptake of the Rural Environment Protection Scheme? (Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment working papers 48). Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
  • Vollenweider, Xavier, Di Falco, Salvatore, O’Donoghue, Cathal (2011). The impact of risk on inequality: evidence from the Irish agricultural sector. (Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment working papers 47). Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    • 2009
  • Groom, Ben, Palmer, Charles (2009). Environmental services and poverty alleviation: either, or, or both? (Discussion paper series 46.2009). University of Cambridge. Department of Land Economy.
    • 2006
  • Di Falco, Salvatore, Chavas, Jean-Paul (2006). Crop genetic diversity, farm productivity and the management of environmental risk in rainfed agriculture. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 33(3), 289-314. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurrag/jbl016
    • 2005
  • Kondylis, Florence (2005). Agricultural returns and conflict: quasi-experimental evidence from a policy intervention programme in Rwanda. (CEPDP 709). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance.